タイトル：築地市場移転問題で土壌サンプル廃棄差し止め訴訟 原告側が説明会を開催
撮影日時：10月27日（水）
東京都中央区にある築地市場の移転予定地となっている江東区豊洲地区の土壌汚染を巡り、市場で働く仲卸業者や都民ら200人以上が都に対し、都が調査のため移転予定地の土壌から採取したサンプルの土を廃棄しないよう求めている訴訟の第7回目の口頭弁論がきょう、東京地裁であった。
都はこれまでに、移転予定地計4,122ヶ所でボーリング調査を実施し、サンプルの土を採取。このサンプルをもとに有害物質の分布状況を分析し、汚染対策を立てた。
しかし、原告側は、「都の土壌汚染対策は極めてずさんで不十分。現に移転予定地に存在する有害物質を確実に除去できない。土壌汚染対策を再検証することなく、市場の移転が行われたなら、有害物質によって、市場で働く業者の生命身体が害される可能性が極めて高い。都が、客観的な再検証可能な唯一の証拠物を廃棄することはあってはならない」と主張している。
東京都中央卸売市場広報課はAPF通信社の取材に対し、「原告側の主張は言いがかりに過ぎない」「国内最高レベルの専門家会議において、必要な土壌汚染対策を講じれば、有害物質は確実に取り除くことができ、例え、人が移転予定地に一生涯住み続けたとしても絶対に健康被害は生じない、という提言が出ている」「土のサンプルは採取から2年が経過し、すでに劣化しているため、再検証しても意味がない」と話した。
VTRは、原告側がきょうの口頭弁論終了後、弁護士会館で開いた説明会の一部始終。
VTRに登場する方々は順番に、梓澤和幸弁護士（原告弁護団代表）、山崎治雄氏（原告代表）、大城聡弁護士（原告弁護団事務局長）。
You should take part in a contest for one of the best blogs on the web. I will recommend this site!
There are some attention-grabbing points on this article however I don’t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There may be some validity but I will take hold an opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like more! Added to FeedBurner as well.
This website online is really a walk-through for all the info you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse right here, and you’ll positively uncover it.
I must examine with you here, which isn’t one thing I normally do! I enjoy reading a post that will make folks think. Additionally, thanks for permitting me to remark!
Nice post. I learn one thing on completely different blogs everyday. It’s going to all the time be stimulating to read content from other writers and apply just a little something from their blog.
Congratulations on having one of the most sophisticated blogs Ive come across in some time! Its just incredible how much you can take away from something simply because of how visually beautiful it is. Youve put together a great blog space –great graphics, videos, layout. This is definitely a must-see blog!
I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work.
Thanks a lot for your post. I would really like to write my opinion that the expense of car insurance varies widely from one scheme to another, given that there are so many different issues which play a role in the overall cost. By way of example, the make and model of the auto will have an enormous bearing on the price. A reliable older family car will have a less expensive premium than just a flashy fancy car.
That’s some inspirational stuff. Couldn’t know that opinions might be this varied. Thank you for all of the enthusiasm to provide such helpful information here.
Outstanding read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I discovered it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!